home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
NetNews Offline 2
/
NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso
/
news
/
comp
/
std
/
c
/
312
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-08-06
|
2KB
|
46 lines
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.std.c
Path: in2.uu.net!world!mv!usenet
From: ENGR@GSSI.MV.COM (Michael Furman)
Subject: Re: Integral conversion e.t.c. (was: Re: Hungarian notation)
Message-ID: <DMBp73.1wv@mv.mv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Organization: GSSI
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 22:01:50 GMT
References: <30C40F77.53B5@swsbbs.com> <SPENCER.96Jan22113215@zorgon.ERA.COM> <KANZE.96Feb5133404@slsvewt.lts.sel.alcatel.de>
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.10
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: gssi.mv.com
In article <KANZE.96Feb5133404@slsvewt.lts.sel.alcatel.de>,
kanze@lts.sel.alcatel.de says...
>
>There is no `asm' keyword in the C standard.
>
>I do see a difference in using an `asm' extension (with the meaning as
>in classical C) and dereferencing a null pointer, in that the first is
>not undefined behavior; it requires a diagnostic, so presumably,
>anyone porting my code will stumble across it, and realize that they
>have a portability problem.
>
>But this only works because `asm' is *not* undefined behavior.
Ok - I believe that I am not correct. I do not have C standard and I was
just guessing. But C++ draft definitly contains "asm". Is it changed in
C++ (in "my" direction) or I am wrong again?
>--
>James Kanze Tel.: (+33) 88 14 49 00 email: kanze@gabi-soft.fr
>GABI Software, Sarl., 8 rue des Francs-Bourgeois, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
>Conseils, Θtudes et rΘalisations en logiciel orientΘ objet --
> -- A la recherche d'une activitΘ dans une region francophone
>
--
<<<<<<<< This is a copy of post to the newsgroup >>>>>>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Furman, (603)893-1109
Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. fax:(603)889-3984
13 Klein Drive - P.O. Box 97 engr@gssi.mv.com
North Salem, NH 03073-0097 71543.1334@compuserve.com
---------------------------------------------------------------